When a photo has a little information, I just love it. I don’t have a year but I am thinking this image is from the early to mid-1940s or the WWII era. I am basing this guess on her style of clothing and uniform.
The back of the photo has a name: John K. Dablin (USAF) and mother. I do not know if he was actually home on leave or leaving for active duty. I hope he came home safely.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
The original image was badly damaged. But I restored it to the best of my abilities. I also added color. The image does not have any names or location. However someone wrote a year: 1922.
From their facial features, I believe they are all siblings.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
The image is from an estate sale. But there is actually some information on the back of the original photo.
The handwriting reads: “Jane, aged 1 years”. Then it continues with “At Mrs. Roger’s where we lived on Canal St.”
There is also a printers mark with the following information: “Nov. 15. 1925.”
Unfortunately, there are no last names or further location details. But she seems to be enjoying herself. There is a small toy car next to her.
Until next time…peace.
This is originally a black and white photograph. I would place the date in the early 1950s. There’s no date on the image. I added some color. (Mostly because I wanted to see the hat).
The back of the original print reads: I love this! Stevie in Auntie Jane’s clothes. It’s definitely a very cute photo.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
The image is from an estate sale. I do have a little information on the photo. Even though, you cannot see her face.
The back of the photo reads: Ruth Jane, 4 months old. There’s also a printer’s mark that reads: May 12, 1929.
If you look closely at the image, there’s someone holding her up or in place.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
Here’s another image from an auction sale. The original photograph has a small tear and other damage. But I did clean it up to the best of my abilities. I also added a little color to the image.
The photo has information on the back. In the upper right corner is the date: 1915. There is also two names on the back. If I am reading the writing correctly, it says– Carl Schmidt and Mayme Cronin.
When the photo is enlarged on my computer, the details of the background come into view. I believe the couple are walking around a farm.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
This is another photo from an auction sale. I don’t have any information on the image. To me the two young people in the photo look like siblings. But I am only guessing.
Focusing on boy’s attire especially the tweed jacket and the girl’s wire rimmed glasses, I am placing this image in the late 1930s.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
I know there’s still a couple spots on this image. But the original photograph was damaged. I didn’t want to lose all of the details. Anyway, I purchased this image as part of an auction lot.
Unfortunately, the only information on the photo is the year-1923. I wonder if the young couple are standing in front of their new home. Or perhaps, they just got engaged.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
I picked this photo up at an auction sale. Unfortunately, the image does not contain a date. But I would place the image in the late 1930s or early 1940s. I am basing this guess on the clothing, hair style, and the type of photo.
The photo does have details on the back:
Henry & Emma Shoberg, Mathilda Shoberg Sarver Killeen, & Ellen V. Shoberg Dahlin.
I am assuming this is a family gathering. There are others swimming in the river. Perhaps, the photo was taking at a family reunion or just a day out.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
Like most of my photos, I do not have any information. From the style of her dress and shoes, I am placing this photo in the early 1940s. She appears to be posing by a flower bush. I wonder if her dress is for a special occasion?
Of course, I am only guessing.
What do you think?
Until next time…peace
